Non-dictatorial extensive social choice
نویسندگان
چکیده
Different social planners may have different opinions on the wellbeing of individuals under different social options (Roberts, 1980). If utilities are translationor ratio-scale measurable, or if the social ranking might be incomplete, or if interplanner comparability is allowed; then there exists non-dictatorial aggregation rules. We propose extensions, intersections, and mixtures of the Pareto, utilitarian, leximin, Kolm-Pollak, and iso-elastic rules.
منابع مشابه
The Structure of Strategy-Proof Social Choice Part II: Non-Dictatorship, Anonymity and Neutrality*
Domains of generalized single-peaked preferences are classified in terms of the extent to which they enable well-behaved strategy-proof social choice. Generalizing the Gibbard-Satterthwaite Theorem, we characterize the domains that admit non-dictatorial strategy-proof social choice functions. We also provide characterizations of the domains that enable locally non-dictatorial, anonymous, and ne...
متن کاملCharacterization of Domains Admitting Strategy-Proof and Non-Dictatorial Social Choice Functions with Infinite Sets of Alternatives
We show, with an example, that the theorem on the characterization of the domains admitting strategy-proof and non-dictatorial social choice functions by Kalai and Muller (1977) does not hold when the set of alternatives is infinite. We consider two ways of overcoming this problem. The first identifies a set of domains admitting strategy-proof and non-dictatorial social choice functions when th...
متن کاملMaximal Domains for Strategy-proof or Maskin monotonic Choice Rules
Domains of individual preferences for which the well-known impossibility Theorems of Gibbard-Satterthwaite and Muller-Satterthwaite do not hold are studied. First, we introduce necessary and sufficient conditions for a domain to admit non-dictatorial, Pareto efficient and either strategy-proof or Maskin monotonic social choice rules. Next, to comprehend the limitations the two Theorems imply fo...
متن کاملOn the manipulability of the fuzzy social choice functions
In the social decision making context, a manipulator attempts to change the social choice in his favor by misrepresenting his preferences. Gibbard and Satterthwaite [7,10] established independently that a strategic manipulation can be observed when using any non-dictatorial voting choice procedure. In this paper, we are interested in the manipulation of the social choice when individuals reveal...
متن کاملSome Results for Impossibility Theorems of Social Welfare Function and Social Choice Function
We present some results on social welfare function and social choice function. First, we replace weak Pareto principle of Arrow’s axioms with strong Pareto principle, and then show that assuming unrestricted domain property, independence of irrelevant alternatives and strong Pareto principle on a social welfare function in Arrow’s sense leads to the existence of first to nth commanders whose st...
متن کامل